When companies scale from a benchtop lab to pilot-scale production, many focus on process efficiency, space requirements, and throughput. But too few stop to ask one essential question: Are we operating in an electrically hazardous environment?
At Re:Build Optimation, we’ve seen how early hazardous area classification (HAC) assessments can fundamentally change the trajectory of a manufacturing project. When addressed early, HAC acts as a hidden risk reducer, informing design decisions, avoiding costly rework, and ensuring safety and compliance from the start. This blog breaks down why early HAC matters and how to approach it as a strategic investment rather than a compliance chore.
For many startups and scaling companies, the transition from lab-scale experimentation to pilot-scale production feels like a natural extension of what they have already been doing. The processes look similar, the space may only be slightly larger, and the same team of engineers is often leading the charge. As a result, companies tend to carry over the same tools, safety assumptions, and workflows that served them well in the lab. But this assumption can be dangerous.
Pilot-scale production is not simply a larger version of the lab. It is fundamentally a different operational and regulatory environment. Once you introduce larger volumes of chemicals, more powerful equipment, and higher-throughput processes, you enter the realm of industrial manufacturing. At that point, the full scope of building codes, fire safety regulations, electrical standards, and OSHA requirements comes into play. From the perspective of the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ), there is no legal distinction between pilot and full-scale production. The moment your operation moves out of the lab, you are subject to the same rules and liabilities as any other manufacturer.
To be clear, laboratories are not free from regulation or oversight. They must comply with specific safety standards, such as NFPA 45, and these requirements are evaluated and enforced by the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ). A laboratory environment should be viewed as a modified version of full-scale production, where reduced quantities of hazardous materials and the specialized knowledge of those operating within the space, such as engineers and specially trained operators, allow for a more controlled and limited scope of risk. However, this does not eliminate the need for rigorous safety protocols or code compliance. What changes is the scale and scope of regulatory application, not the obligation to follow best practices or ensure a safe working environment. This means that practices which may have been acceptable in a lab setting can become serious safety and compliance issues in a production environment. Ordinary wiring, non-electrically rated enclosures, lack of proper labeling, and even informal behaviors by operators can all introduce risks that were never fully addressed in the lab.
That is why a mindset shift is critical. Your team is no longer testing a concept. They are building a system that must operate reliably, safely, and in compliance with applicable codes and other compulsory requirements, such as for insurance coverage. The transition to pilot production requires a more structured approach to engineering, facility planning, and risk management. It is not just about increasing capacity. It is about increasing accountability.
Re:Build Optimation has worked with many companies at this turning point. The ones that succeed are those who recognize early that pilot production is not just an operational upgrade. It is the beginning of true manufacturing, and it must be treated that way from the very first step.
Before any design, layout, or equipment decisions are made, companies must ask a critical question: Are we operating in an environment that carries the potential for fire or explosion?
This kind of situational awareness is often missing, especially in early-stage or rapidly scaling operations. Teams may be focused on throughput, floor plans, or procurement without pausing to assess the nature of the materials they are handling and the risks those materials can introduce. The assumption is often that if a process worked in a lab, it will work just as well in a larger facility. That is a risky mindset.
If your process involves flammable or combustible substances such as gases, vapors, liquids, or dusts, you may be operating in a hazardous location. These environments are subject to specific electrical classifications, which dictate everything from wiring methods and enclosures to ventilation, labeling, and personnel access. Without proper classification, any equipment you install or infrastructure you build could be non-compliant or unsafe.
Hazardous area classification defines the boundaries of risk. It informs what type of equipment is permitted, how operators must be trained, what emergency systems are required, and what signage or controls must be in place. It also determines whether additional engineering controls are necessary to mitigate ignition sources or contain potential incidents.
Failing to perform this assessment early in the project creates a high risk of rework, permitting delays, regulatory violations, or worse, a critical safety incident. At Re:Build Optimation, we have seen firsthand how overlooking hazardous area classification at the outset can lead to significant setbacks later. Situational awareness is not just a step in the process. It is the foundation of safe and compliant facility planning. Getting it right from the beginning is not a recommendation. It is a requirement.
Early hazardous area classification is not about bureaucracy or red tape. It is a strategic tool that guides safe and efficient facility design. When completed at the outset of a project, HAC provides the framework for a series of decisions that protect people, equipment, and investments throughout the life of the operation.
Getting the classification right from the start unlocks several important advantages:
At Re:Build Optimation, we view hazardous area classification as a powerful planning tool. It is not just about what you avoid. It is about what you enable.
Having the right equipment is only part of the equation. Even the most advanced systems cannot compensate for a facility that is not properly designed to handle hazardous processes. A hazardous area classification (HAC) assessment does more than guide electrical decisions. It also drives essential questions about the building itself.
Before moving forward, companies must evaluate whether their facility is engineered to support the risks associated with their operations. This includes reviewing structural, safety, and regulatory considerations such as:
These considerations are not just box-checking exercises. They are fundamental to protecting lives, reducing risk, and preventing catastrophic events. If your building is not suitable for hazardous operations, the consequences can be severe. In many cases, teams move forward assuming their facility is acceptable, only to be stopped during permitting or inspected after an incident occurs.
At Re:Build Optimation, we often work with companies who discover these issues too late. Delays, redesigns, and retrofits can be avoided by addressing the suitability of the building from the outset. HAC is not only about what happens inside the process. It is about whether the surrounding structure is truly capable of supporting the work you intend to do.
Hazardous area classification (HAC) is not simply a technical requirement. It reflects a deeper cultural commitment to safety, responsibility, and accountability across an organization. Identifying hazardous areas is only the beginning. Operating within them requires a workforce that not only understands the risks, but also consistently acts in ways that minimize those risks.
At Re:Build Optimation, we believe that HAC is as much about people as it is about equipment and design. The most well-engineered system will still fail if the people interacting with it are not trained, informed, and aligned with safety expectations. That is why we emphasize the development of a strong safety culture that reaches every level of an organization.
This culture must start at the top. Executives and project leaders must prioritize safety in decision-making, resource allocation, and communication. Design and engineering teams must internalize the requirements of classified areas and treat compliance as a foundational element of their work. Operators and technicians must be trained to recognize hazards, follow procedures, and report issues proactively.
To encourage a deeper level of awareness, companies should ask themselves the following questions:
These questions are not hypothetical. They are essential for any team operating in or near hazardous environments. Safety culture is not just about rules. It is about foresight, empathy, and organizational resilience. The consequences of overlooking culture can be severe. All it takes is one person to enter a classified space without understanding the environment, one action taken without awareness, or one shortcut in a maintenance procedure to compromise the safety of an entire facility.
Building a safety culture is not a one-time initiative. It is an ongoing process of education, reinforcement, and accountability. When organizations take this seriously, they not only comply with regulations but also create safer, more resilient operations.
Re:Build Optimation works with clients to embed this mindset early and support it through training, documentation, and system design. Culture is not a soft add-on to compliance. It is one of the most critical factors in keeping people safe and operations running as intended.
Hazardous area classification is not just about checking boxes or satisfying regulatory requirements. It is about laying the groundwork for an operation that is safe, resilient, and fully prepared to scale. When addressed early, HAC helps companies make smarter decisions that prevent injuries, reduce liability, and protect long-term investments.
If your company is transitioning from lab-scale development to pilot or full-scale production, this is the moment to step back and ask the hard questions. Are you aware of the hazards present in your environment? Do your facilities reflect the risk profile of your processes? Have your teams been trained to operate in classified areas? If the answer to any of these questions is unclear, the danger is not hypothetical. The risk is already present.
These challenges cannot be solved with guesswork. They require expertise, planning, and a proactive approach. By working with experienced professionals like the team at Re:Build Optimation, companies can avoid costly missteps and build a facility that supports safety and compliance from day one. Our team helps guide the classification process, align infrastructure and equipment with code requirements, and ensure that personnel are fully prepared to operate in hazardous environments.
An early investment in hazardous area classification is one of the most effective ways to reduce long-term risk. It prevents rework, accelerates permitting, and strengthens your ability to deliver reliable operations. More importantly, it helps protect your people, your products, and your reputation.
Build it right from the beginning. Your future success depends on it.
Re:Build Optimation has deep experience in hazardous area classifications and compliance engineering. Contact us to start the conversation.
Looking to connect with an experienced team?
Look no further than Re:Build Optimation! We are excited to connect with you.
